Row edge-slant Shape Decorative svg added to bottom

M&A Listing Agreement Dangers

By: Frances Brunelle

M&A Agreement

Getting ready to sell your business is an emotional and complex journey. You’ve built value over the years, only to find that the “fine print” in your M&A advisor’s listing agreement might be designed to take a slice of assets you never intended to sell, specifically, your hard-earned cash.

Here is a detailed deep dive into these hidden dangers, written to help you protect your exit proceeds.

The Hidden “Leaking” of Your Exit Proceeds

When a business owner signs an engagement letter with an M&A firm or business broker, the focus is usually on the Success Fee: the percentage the broker earns when the deal closes. However, the most critical part of that contract isn’t the percentage itself; it’s the definition of “Transaction Value.

If you aren’t careful, you may find yourself paying a 5% to 10% commission on the cash sitting in your company bank account, money that was never part of the “sale” of the business operations.

1. The Trap: Charging Fees on Retained Assets

In most lower-middle-market M&A deals, businesses are sold on a “Cash-Free, Debt-Free” basis. This means the seller keeps the cash and pays off all company debt before or at closing.

The “hidden danger” arises when a broker’s agreement defines the purchase price as the “Total Enterprise Value,” including all assets transferred or retained.

Why Charging on Cash is Inappropriate

  • No Value Added: A broker’s job is to find a buyer and negotiate a premium for your goodwill and operations. They did not “sell” your cash; you already owned it.
  • The Double Dip: If a buyer pays $10M for your business and you also have $1M in the bank that you keep, an aggressive listing agreement might try to charge a fee on $11M.
  • Incentive Misalignment: If a broker gets paid on cash, they may not fight as hard for a higher enterprise value because their “floor” is already padded by your balance sheet.

2. The “Double-Sided” Success Fee

Another danger lurking in listing agreements is the lack of transparency regarding dual representation. Some firms may include clauses that allow them to collect fees from both the seller and the buyer.

If your advisor is being paid by the person on the other side of the table, whose interest are they truly protecting? Always insist on a “No Dual Agency” clause or a full disclosure requirement.

3. The “Tail” That Wags the Dog

The “Tail Period” is a standard clause stating that if you sell your business to a buyer the broker introduced after the contract ends, you still owe the fee.

  • The Danger: Vague language can make this tail apply to any buyer, even if the broker never talked to them.
  • The Fix: Limit the tail to a “Prospect List” of specific names the broker actually engaged with during the term.

4. Unrealistic Expense Reimbursements

Some M&A firms charge a “Retainer” or “Work Fee” up front, plus a monthly “Administrative Fee.” While some costs are legitimate, “uncapped” expenses can lead to nasty surprises.

  • The Danger: Agreements that allow the firm to bill for “travel, marketing, and overhead” without prior written approval.
  • The Fix: Cap out-of-pocket expenses at a specific dollar amount (e.g., $5,000) and require receipts for anything over $500. Better yet, work with a firm that only charges a success fee.

The Bottom Line

An M&A advisor should be your greatest ally, not a hidden liability. If a firm insists on charging a commission on the cash you’ve already earned and tucked away in your business, it’s a major red flag regarding their ethics and transparency

Sign Up for Insights, M&A Tips, and Quarterly Newsletter.

Scroll to Top